Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | LukaCEnzo's commentslogin

Other traits like height, health, beauty vary and are influenced by genetics. Intelligence varies between species, and is therefore, at least in part determined by genetics.

Presuming that there are only mentally disabled and normal people is the weird hypothesis. The baseline idea should be that it varies just like health and height. Affected by both genetics and outside factors such as malnutrition and injuries.


This is very nicely put. I wish I had thought of this phrasing when I posted my original comment. The point of my comment was to mention that there are heretical ideas that people won’t discuss in other areas of intellectual inquiry. That was the relation of my comment to the article.


I think they meant Apple and content scanning system to be used initially for finding CP


Communist party?


Capitalist proles.


Cheese Pizza


Did you mean this: https://youtu.be/IFe9wiDfb0E


No, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_of_Tomorrow_(film)

The child's doodles make it seem like a lighthearted thing. It is not.

A grownup is attempting to explain some fairly dark things to a very young child. Mercifully, the child cannot absorb what it is being told. You may not be so lucky. But there is some biting social commentary and the absurdity of the whole thing makes it work.


If people are curious they can find more info on cs.rin.ru steam forums. Great resource.


Played DotA. The map is fixed size.


It could also be that you only need a certain percent of new content to keep eyeballs. Thus, by only showing some new content at a time, instead of all at once (as in a chronological feed), you would increase user engagement time.


I think that the disagreement stems from the difference between what you and him mean by definition.

We use words to describe, and to categorize stuff. But naturally this vague. Everybody undestands if you describe a shirt as blue.or green, but most people would find it hard to describe when one turns to another, where the boundary between them is. So we use other names for that, or describe it as blueish green, or something similar.

To get rid of confusion, handle edge cases, and for other reasons, we define formal defenitions, which are different from the ambiguous idea we have of something.

What the comment you replied to means, is that the formal definition doesn't fit his idea of what is natural. You on the other hand are saying that the formal definition is the only (valid) meaning of the word, and so it can't be good or bad.


Yes.

Not to mention that "anything untouched by humans" is not the formal definition of "natural."


It's used mostly in and for Czechia. Why would someone in Czechia care about the rest of the globe when he'll mostly use it to find stuff in Czechia?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: