Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | fuzzfactor's commentslogin

C'mon, he's more than a mere clothes horse with a wardrobe.

There's also makeup.

He's obviously got his own high-dollar custom color pallette now, and more-accomplished artists to better co-ordinate with the costumes and the lighting.

No more looking like the average person with that run-of-the-mill plain commodity orange.


Exactly. Plenty of them can probably afford it easier than averge people.

Why?

Because they were not wise enough or mature enough to know better, when at such critical times they had best be putting such defective characters down at every opportunity instead.

Same as it ever was.


If it looks like a communist dictator, acts like a communist dictator, and quacks like a communist dictator, might as well be a communist dictator.

Good example of what they have in Japan right now.

The Maverick is quite sizable compared to the original Ford Ranger too, which was still bigger than the regular Japanese trucks that were all over the US after oil skyrocketed the first time:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukmzZ5DXBqQ


And every wire or PCB trace is an antenna, broadcasting and/or receiving whatever it has access to, at its own particular frequencies.

Across distances according to the power available, where ariel orientation makes a big difference, "as expected".


>"The act of buying has no correlation with whether you need them or not,"

That sounds like the typical kind of asset that's not affordable for anyone except those who have everything else they might desire already.

Well look at the way well-heeled capitalists are competing for the outstanding non-compute aspects of AI, and therefore driving up what they are willing to pay for that portion of the picture, similar to how it would be done on Wall Street in their market. Where of course some huge shareholder stakes are also fluctuating simultaneously.

Then look at the compute being bid up in addition to that. Another element where there's only so much to go around. Now this is a good investment, it's going up so fast that even if you don't use it you should be able to sell for more before too long, and make a pretty good profit without having to do any computing at all :0

There's always been more money in "irrational exuberance" anyway.

While it lasts, but sooner or later you reach a point where there's nowhere to go but down.


The main reason to reduce feature size since quite some time has been to make more money per wafer, and faster.

Same reason that so much work was put into increasing wafer diameter over the decades.

More chips per wafer means a lot.

Much more than for performance sake.


Excellent article, Mr. Hacker :)

>ASML started off life within Philips, the Dutch consumer electronics giant.

Who started with light bulbs which were using the electrons for direct visual and UI/UX purposes. Some of the most simple electronic components, but quite a bit like appliances themselves. No surprise a lamp in English means either a bulb, an appliance, or both.

Vacuum tubes were the next step up in complexity and I guess you can take it from there.

In the early radio days it didn't take too many "ampules" to make a radio. Not nearly as complex as a cellphone, but bizarrely more complicated than a light bulb already.

The Edison Effect turned out to be a very strong force after all :)

At one time every building that had electronics, had vacuum tubes. When you moved a radio or TV set, you were carrying your own little vacuum chambers with you from place to place, even as late as CRT's.

With solid-state electronics like this, the vacuum chambers are much bigger, but are only located in a centralized factory process, so you don't have to carry them around with you if you want to be portable.

You wouldn't want to anyway, look how heavy they have gotten ;)


Many modern electronics still contain a vacuum because MEMS gyroscopes use a high vacuum.

The search response also said MEMS oscillators (modern performance replacements for quartz crystals) use a high vacuum but given the iPhone 8 was famously "bricked" by Helium affecting a MEMS oscillator - I'm unsure about that!

https://www.vice.com/en/article/why-a-helium-leak-disabled-e...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microelectromechanical_system_...


MEMS oscillators do use a vacuum, and that's why they're susceptible to helium. A helium atom is tiny compared to an oxygen or nitrogen atom, and can leak through many otherwise-perfect seals.

So, a (badly-designed) MEMS oscillator is basically a region of vacuum enclosed by a membrane that only helium can permeate. Of course exposing it to helium is going to permanently change its behavior! Once the helium gets in, there's no reason for it to leave, due to the vastly higher atmospheric pressure outside.


Very interesting. Good info about both the gyroscopes and oscillators. I didn't know that much progress had been made.

I remember when MEMS started getting capable of micro fluid handling, but wasn't aware of what they were doing with "lack of fluid" :)

Really bringing the little vacuum chambers out of the big vacuum chamber and onto the street.

Over the decades I have often thought about doing something like that, but not really micro.

Now I'm suspicious about something I hadn't considered before at a previous employer's chem lab. Last month when they called me back in, there was inconsistent oscillation being applied (sometimes not) to a key analog sensor on one instrument which is about the same vintage as the iPhone 6 where the problem showed up from the early MEMS oscillators. These instruments have been there for over a decade and it may be some other electronic problem, but this does coincide with a couple additional gas analyzers they brought in a few months ago which are now wasting about 5x more helium than I was using when I was controlling it. Exhausting into one lab, but not having a completely isolated ventilation system.

Now I know something to try next time and that's not even why they called me in this time.

This could actually be one of those problems that shows up intermittently depending on which way the "wind" blows ;)

Sometimes the best way to fix things is to wait until you're smarter :0

Thanks to all for very valuable info and links.


>the world’s leading energy economist has reiterated his endorsement of a fair and managed transition in the North Sea

>“I still cannot understand that the world was so blind-sided, that the global economy can be held hostage to a 50km strait.”

Yikes. I would have hoped he had the deepest understanding of these kind of things :\


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: