This prompt actually works pretty well. I suspect that because you added a step requiring the model to list out what it needs to draw first, it has a much easier time creating a reasonable SVG. https://chat.openai.com/share/be9cea50-d00d-4b05-ab54-b64619...
Happy for a service which only lets you look at 3 days worth of logs until you pay more just to see more logs?
Besides, their technical skill is pretty poor when their site shows "page not found" of some sort on log in process for a split second and when you try to search through the logs, they will quickly show you that I've made excessive access after less than 10 searches.
They had an incident on themselves and I asked them to resend the emails that they failed to send and support couldn't do that and that got us off of SendGrid.
Large free plan limit is the only good part about SendGrid.
> their technical skill is pretty poor when their site shows "page not found" of some sort on log in process for a split second and when you try to search through the logs
This is typical of single page apps. They have a default state of "no data" and then they update it when they get a response.
- Able to work full time in our office in Williamsburg, Brooklyn
- Can quickly master highly technical processes and our video hosting platform
- Familiarity with live chat and support email platforms; phone experience a plus
- 3+ years of SAAS customer success experience
- Must be an excellent multi-tasker with a keen eye for detail and getting things right the first time
- Ability to maintain a polite, calm, and positive attitude in all interactions with our customers even in stressful situations
- Excellent writing skills and a strong command of English grammar; able to adopt the SproutVideo voice
Check out our jobs page for information about how to apply.
Is anyone else troubled by how they're trying to drive traffic away from the site on which the disqus comments are embedded? It doesn't look like there is any way to disable this functionality.
SproutVideo founder here. We actually introduced an import tool for DailyMotion Cloud users to easily import their videos into a SproutVideo account. DailyMotion Cloud was a product of DailyMotion. DailyMotion Cloud is shutting down on April 12th. DailyMotion has offered to migrate their users to their main platform but that puts several serious restrictions on content such as:
* Distribution of your video catalog on Dailymotion.com
* Monetization of your video catalog
* Compliance with our content moderation rules
For many users, this is simply not a viable solution. SproutVideo offers a very comparable platform and we've already had several former DailyMotion Cloud users import their content. Companies can have very large video libraries and migrating to a new video hosting platform can be a lot of work. To that end, we created a tool that will allow former DailyMotion Cloud users automatically import their libraries into a SproutVideo account. Hopefully that clears things up a bit! http://sproutvideo.com/dailymotion
There is both an universal oEmbed API and we also have Extraction API. The extraction API is super useful when you need to know more about what the page's meta information is.
I think the usefulness of a SSG really depends on your goals. If your goal is simply to publish a blog, perhaps a SSG is not the right solution for you. SSGs are interesting because they have zero external dependences. I can just deploy my blog to Amazon S3, use CloudFront if I so choose, and never have to worry about scalability or how much traffic my blog can handle. To me, that is more important than the perceived friction that it takes to get a post online.
Although Alibaba is a huge company that does a ton of different things, I feel like this article went out of the way to avoid mentioning that companies like Google and Amazon (as well as Microsoft and Apple to a lesser extent) come close to checking all of these boxes. The other thing to point out is that Alibaba owns stakes in many of these companies and doesn't really own them outright.
As others have already pointed out how Google compares, take Amazon for instance:
Online Payments - Amazon Payments
Cloud Services - Amazon Web Services
Mobile Apps - Amazon AppStore
Mobile OS - Amazon FireOS
Maps and Navigation - Amazon Maps API
Retail Outlets - N/A
Group Buying - Amazon Local
Cloud Storage - Amazon CloudDrive / Amazon S3
Mobile Messaging - N/A
Car Service, Ride Sharing - N/A
C2C e-commerice - Amazon Services/Amazon WebStore (not quite the same, but close)
* Search Engine (Google Search)
Web Browser (Chrome)
* Laptop/Desktop OS (Chrome OS)
* Wearable Tech (Android Wear, Google Glass)
etc.
Also for many offerings like Aliyun and Aliyun OS pale in comparison in the features offered by AWS or Android.
I went to an Alibaba presentation in the US awhile ago. They want to pursue the same strategy as Google and focus deep on big data and Machine Learning rather than building out huge logistic infrastructure like Amazon. This is probably a good idea since the margins are better.
The difference is that Google is using low-res satellite imagery, rather than high-res drone imagery. Maybe that will change now that they've bought Titan Aerospace.
Google uses drone imagery for some cities, San Francisco being one of them, using different angles to create the 3D model of the city, and satellite imagery for the rest of the planet. It's exactly what this company is doing. From what I can see, Google Maps also uses different textures depending on the viewing angle.
I don't have any idea what they are using there, but they do pull in a lot of aerial photos from the U.S. government. Those photos are (largely?) taken from piloted planes though.
I'm not sure why you think it's lower res. It looks about equivalent to me. The trees look a bit odd in Google maps, but the quality of the building windows and cars looks about the same.
Here's a more nuanced theory: The building fronts, cars, etc look great because they are from street view. The roofs, treetops, etc, look terrible, because they are from satellite.
The roofs, treetops, etc. look terrible because the depth data is significantly lower resolution than the photos. This causes the deformed polygons you're seeing... The actual resolution of the photos of the roofs/treetops are just as good as everything else, they're just stretched over bad 3d data.
Does that mean this isn't cool? This is off the hook. Looks very similar to the iPad versions of Berlin.. high-res images quite a smart Level-of-detail differentiating between zoomlevels.
With .bin files (maybe to keep the format closed? are just raw speed?)
If this is done in an automated way they are on to something pretty great.
Also to do this, is really really hard/lots of work. So kudos for that.
