Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

These towers are not very land-efficient compared to solar farms, but they are very cheap to build. So it seems strange to build them in the US instead of a large third-world nation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_updraft_tower#History



Getting the power to the US from a large third world nation is probably not as cheap as easy as building them in the US. There is also lots of land in Arizona that isn't useful for very many things.


I wasn't suggesting that we should route the power to the US from the third world. I was saying third-world nations should build these plants, and the US should build other kinds.


They're still a helluva lot more expensive than coal-powered plants, which is what the third world is actually building.


Which is where carbon-trading comes in. We give third-world nations extra money so they can build these instead of coal plants. They give us their carbon credit so we can continue to drive stretch Hummers. Win-win!

Except for the polar bears.


Well, Andy Grove thinks that won't work unless the third world country is in your continent: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07...




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: