In my opinion they don't "owe" anyone that obligation, unless it's a contractual obligation associated with using a Mac. But just because it's not owed to anyone, doesn't mean there isn't a nicer way to handle it just to be nice.
That said, I don't immediately see evidence that this gentleman is in the security field, and perhaps isn't aware of responsible disclosure. Full disclosure isn't the worst thing in the world.
To whom does he owe that obligation? Apple? The public? Both? Why?