I'd have to disagree, there's a big difference between flaming and being to the point.
I'd rather hear or read a "It fails because X Y Z" then having to go thru a lengthy prose or statement that says "it has been incontrovertibly proven that the restrictions and performance metaphors applied to X as it cascades thru Y is causing an undesired negative effect on Z. Therefore we can only conclude it's marginally very disappointing."
The content in question is very much to the point in my opinion, some of it I consider being written in jest so how this is "negative and caustic" escapes me.
You have to be polite and well spoken or efficient and terse, you can't be both at the same time.
I'd rather hear or read a "It fails because X Y Z" then having to go thru a lengthy prose or statement that says "it has been incontrovertibly proven that the restrictions and performance metaphors applied to X as it cascades thru Y is causing an undesired negative effect on Z. Therefore we can only conclude it's marginally very disappointing."
The content in question is very much to the point in my opinion, some of it I consider being written in jest so how this is "negative and caustic" escapes me.
You have to be polite and well spoken or efficient and terse, you can't be both at the same time.