Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The fallacy goes:

- breaking a window for no reason costs money, so it's economically bad

- but actually it generates labour and might be economically good?

- no, that's a fallacy, you've made the room unusable and reduced its economic worth + wasted labour on a useless repair task instead of improving the system.

The rest of the article says that it might not be a fallacy if you break a significant part of the system and not just a window.

Disclaimer: I don't fully understand the rest of the propositions in the article.



So it boils down to. Don't break the window, burn the building




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: