Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You are arguing that because it is possible to break the law and escape on a technicality, the law is invalid in all cases.


If they "escaped on a technicality" then they weren't breaking the law. That "technicality" is part of the law.

The indefensible part is tying a large difference in import tariffs to how many seats are installed. Absurd outcomes such as this one highlight systematic flaws in the rules. If the basis for the tariffs were logically sound you wouldn't be able to work around them without addressing the reason the tariffs were imposed in the first place.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: