hmm i hadn't thought of a ban scenario. A little google led me here https://stackoverflow.com/a/66105692/3875151, it seems like the user will live on as long as github continues to shadow ban them.
Now I wonder what their involvement with the archive.is team is, the nixos folk seem really pissed off by his removal.
Edit I guess the law was involved somehow. Still doesn't answer why they're logged into archive.is, and how archive.is is able to save their account state, even though github 'disappeared' them: https://web.archive.org/web/20210116151808/https://twitter.c...
Now I wonder what their involvement with the archive.is team is, the nixos folk seem really pissed off by his removal.
Edit I guess the law was involved somehow. Still doesn't answer why they're logged into archive.is, and how archive.is is able to save their account state, even though github 'disappeared' them: https://web.archive.org/web/20210116151808/https://twitter.c...
https://discourse.nixos.org/t/how-was-this-treewide-pr-perfo...