Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'd like to see a side by side comparison with a random human on the street. Maybe with a sample size of 100 or so. How well do you think the humans would do vs whatever outdated model you were playing with here?

There is clearly significant value to this tech and I'm still dumbfounded how strongly some people try to deny it.



Anyone reckon there's a chance that GPT hallucinates because it was trained on online material (e.g. reddit and other forums)? I'd have to say on topics I know GPT is about as hit or miss as a random internet comment, especially in that they'll both give a confidently stated answer whether the answer is factual or not.

Is it possible GPT just thinks[0] that any answer stated confidently is preferable over not giving an answer?

Promise I'm not just being snarky, legitimate wonder!

[0]: I know it doesn't actually think, you know what I mean




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: