Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Wouldn't bigger cascades be more likely to deadend, due to the average density of what's leftover increasing?


My fault for being ambiguous about the word "bigger", thanks for pointing this out. It's true that you're not looking for a large area per se. What you want is a large perimeter. The best starting click would be a whole lot of thin tentacles stretching out across the board, not a giant square-ish clump.

That is, you're trying to maximize information. A large rectangular area doesn't give you nearly as much information about the board as a tentacle-y one, because most of the squares don't tell you anything but their own value.


This is a definite problem on expert. I had a few female friends in college who were insanely good at Minesweeper, able to clear expert more often than not and insanely fast (under 100 seconds). When I was trying to get better and would get excited to get a big cascade, they'd just chuckle knowing that it was just going to make my chances that much more slim.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: