Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It is sensationalist, but there is a small kernel of truth. Economists have major physics envy and want desperately to be a full mathematically based science, but it's more of a social science (as in not hard science). Doing regression models on the economy is obviously somewhat flawed. There is an experimental branch of economics that does repeatable experiments though, so some practicioners are probably pretty close.

There are a lot of things economists almost universally agree on (e.g. price caps bad), but there are big differences in schools of thought. Politicians can choose a la carte and can find an economist to agree with them on practically any policy.



As far as I understand, economics is a part of Social Science, not just resembling it. I don't think it can contend with the other two branches [1] per se - Formal and Natural, whose basis is different.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Branches_of_science


> Economists have major physics envy

All the rigor of pure mathematics, none of the predictive power of Physics.


The sciences, ranked: https://xkcd.com/435/#math-purity




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: