> That is what I was talking about. You replied to it. Why would you reply if you had nothing to add to it?
Because you replied to me in a spirit of contradiction while apparently missing my point. I had some hope of clearing that up, but I see now that was a mistake.
Your point wasn't missed. But your point was made! Thus there was nothing else that could be done with it. Hence why we carried it forward into its natural progression.
For the sake of my understanding, are you trying to suggest that you didn't make a point by, counterintuitively and contradictorily, telling us that you made a point? Or what is it that you are trying to do here?
Because you replied to me in a spirit of contradiction while apparently missing my point. I had some hope of clearing that up, but I see now that was a mistake.