Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

People who need encryption mostly want full-disk encryption, so why not an encrypted volume with btrfs on top?


btrfs does volumes, it should also do volume encryption, why have an unnecessary layer inbetween?


I'm not saying it wouldn't be nice to have, but given that the workaround is there, it doesn't sound like something that should contribute to btrfs being a "suitable replacement for 90% of cases".




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: