> I think that's the issue exposed by this post -- if these really basic things are broken, why would anyone believe that the actual tricky stuff has been tested?
So, I think it is relevant that LWT is still a very new feature in Cassandra and not something basic to it at all (arguably counter to a lot of its original design goals).
Personally, I was much more concerned by the server side timestamps only using millisecond granularity (and even that is somewhat understandable given the JVM's limitations).
So, I think it is relevant that LWT is still a very new feature in Cassandra and not something basic to it at all (arguably counter to a lot of its original design goals).
Personally, I was much more concerned by the server side timestamps only using millisecond granularity (and even that is somewhat understandable given the JVM's limitations).